What interviews with ordinary Germans living under the Nazis can teach us about our current politics

Words like “Nazi” and “fascist” are common nowadays, often used to describe present-day populist leaders or to show disagreement. While comparisons to 1930s Germany may not perfectly fit the complexities of today, there are similarities. The decisions people face in dealing with authoritarianism are one such similarity.

“Darkness Over Germany,” first published in 1943, features conversations with individuals navigating tough choices as the Nazi party gains control. The author, Amy Buller, spent time in Germany in the early 1900s and maintained connections there. Concerned about events in the 1930s, she organized discussions to explore Germany’s path to dictatorship.

Democracy is facing challenges globally in 2025. Is this part of a historical cycle or signifies a more profound shift? Join a London event on May 8 for a panel discussion on these crucial issues. The talks in “Darkness Over Germany” shed light on the economic and emotional factors driving authoritarianism, such as grievances over poverty and a desire for a leader to alleviate suffering.

In the face of fascism, ordinary Germans confronted agonizing choices, from exile to defiance or compliance with the regime. These decisions reflect hope for a better future or the belief that the current situation will pass. Individual responses to fascism in the 1930s echo modern struggles with economic turmoil, social unrest, and the desire for change.

The slide into authoritarianism is fueled by everyday choices made by regular people, rather than madness or evil. Understanding these difficult decisions is essential, not to endorse authoritarianism but to provide alternatives. “Darkness Over Germany” serves as a reminder of the importance of such conversations and the complexities individuals face in challenging times.