Big government is still good, even with Trump in power

President Donald Trump’s second term has sparked a debate on the role of the federal government, with some arguing that a smaller government could limit the power of a potential autocrat. Weaker law enforcement agencies and reduced federal funding for institutions like universities could curb the impact of draconian policies. However, the root issue lies in the lack of oversight, rather than the size of the government.

While many Americans support big government programs like universal healthcare and social security, they often view the concept of “big government” as a threat. The debate over government size is complex, encompassing issues of surveillance, regulation, and welfare. A robust state that can respond effectively in times of crisis is crucial, as seen during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Advocating for a weaker government as a means of constraining potential abuses of power overlooks the importance of checks and balances. Trump’s presidency highlighted the need for stronger oversight mechanisms rather than a reduction in government size. Shrinking government could make public institutions more vulnerable to influence and manipulation.

The focus should be on enhancing oversight within big government programs to prevent abuse and ensure adaptability. Privatization and reducing public services could lead to worse outcomes for citizens. Ultimately, the key to preserving democracy lies in strengthening governmental checks and balances, rather than diminishing the government’s role.